Total Pageviews

Saturday, March 23, 2013

BUKAN SANGAT NAK JADI BANDUAN....



BANDUAN...sana sini BANDUAN ada Banduan yang terus mencari arah untuk menjadi Banduan dan ada juga Banduan yang menginsafi perbuatan mereka dan kembali ke jalan yang benar. Banduan tetap banduan dan tidak ada pilihan lain selain daripada menghadapi rakyat Malaysia dengan gelaran bekas banduan.

Namun dalam banyak banyak banduan ada seorang banduan yang agak berlainan dengan bekas bekas banduan yang lain. Banduan ini cukup GILA kerana beliau merasakan beliau lah Banduan yang paling sempurna kerana dikatakan ANUGERAH TUHAN.

Paling gila apabila Banduan ini melangkaui apa yang telah terbukti dengan bercita cita untuk menjadi Perdana Menteri Malaysia. Banduan mahu jadi Perdana Menteri, Banduan mahu jadi pemimpin Rakyat Malaysia.

Ikuti kisah Banduan yang telah dijatuhi hukuman PENJARA 6 tahun diatas kesalahan RASUAH paling besar dalam sejarah negara Malaysia.


1. "Bahawa kamu pada 24.5.1995 lebih kurang jam 5.30 petang, di Pejabat Menteri Kewangan, di Kementerian Kewangan, Jalan Duta, Kuala Lumpur di dalam Wilayah Persekutuan, semasa menjadi anggota pentadbiran, iaitu, menjawat jawatan Timbalan Perdana Menteri dan Menteri Kewangan telah melakukan perbuatan rasuah berkaitan dengan siasatan Badan Pencegah Rasuah ke atas Setiausaha Sulit kamu, Encik Mohd Azmin bin Ali yang disyaki menerima rasuah sehingga dia telah mengumpulkan harta yang tidak munasabah berbanding dengan pendapatannya, iaitu kamu telah:
a. Campur tangan dalam siasatan itu, dan
b. Mempengaruhi Datuk Shafee bin Yahya, Ketua Pengarah Badan Pencegah Rasuah untuk menutup siasatan kes tersebut bertentangan dengan prosedur siasatan Badan Pencegah Rasuah tanpa merujuk kepada Pendakwa Raya;
Dan dengan perbuatan kamu itu, Encik Mohd Azmin bin Ali telah dilindungi daripada tindakan atau prosiding yang bersifat jenayah dan oleh yang demikian kamu telah melakukan satu kesalahan yang boleh dihukum di bawah Seksyen 2(1) Ordinan No.22 (Kuasa-Kuasa Perlu) Darurat, 1970".
2. "Bahawa kamu, pada 12 Ogos 1997 hingga 18 Ogos 1997, di kediaman rasmi Timbalan Perdana Menteri, No 47, Jalan Damansara, di dalam Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur, semasa menjadi seorang anggota pentadbiran, iaitu, menjawat jawatan Timbalan Perdana Menteri dan Menten Kewangan telah melakukan perbuatan rasuah di mana kamu telah:
- mengarahkan Datuk Mohd Said bin Awang, Pengarah Cawangan Khas dan Amir bin Junus, Timbalan Pengarah Cawangan Khas II, Polis Diraja Malaysia memperoleh pengakuan bertulis daripada Azizan bin Ahu Bakar bagi menafikan salah laku seks dan liwat yang dilakukan oleb kamu dengan tujuan melindungi diri kamu daripada sebarang tindakan atau prosiding yang bersifat jenayah, dan akibatnya Azizan bin Abu Bakar telah memberi pengakuan bertulis bertarikh 18 Ogos 1997 kepada Perdana Menteri seperti mana yang diarahkan, dan oleh yang demikian kamu telah melakukan satu kesalahan yang boleh dihukum di bawah seksyen
2(1) Ordinan No.22 (Kuasa-Kuasa Perlu) Darurat, 1970".
3. "Bahawa kamu, pada 27 Ogos 1997, di Kediaman Rasmi Timbalan Perdana Menteri, No 47, Jalan Damansara, di dalam Wilayah Persekutuan 88 Kuala Lumpur, ketika menjadi seorang anggota pentadbiran, iaitu, menjawat jawatan Timbalan Perdana Menteri dan Menteri Kewangan telah melakukan perbuatan rasuah di mana kamu telah:
- mengarahkan Datuk Mohd Said bin Awang, Pengarah Cawangan Khas dan Amir Bin Junus, Timbalan Pengarah Cawangan Khas II, Polis Diraja Malaysia menggesa Azizan bin Abu Bakar supaya memberi kenyataan umum bertulis bagi menafikan sa1ah laku mereka dan liwat yang dilakukan oleh kamu dengan tujuan melindungi diri kamu daripada sebarang tindakan atau prosiding yang bersifat jenayah dan akihatnya Azizan bin Abu Bakar telah memberikan kenyataan bertu1is seperti mana yang diarahkan dan oleh yang demikian kamu telah melakukan satu kesa1ahan yang boleh dihukum di bawah Seksyen 2(1) Ordinan No. 22 (Kuasa-Kuasa Perlu) Darurat, 1970".
4. "Bahawa kamu pada 12 Ogos 1997 hingga 18 haribulan Ogos 1997, di kediaman rasmi Timbalan Perdana Menteri, No 47, Jalan Damansara, di dalam Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur semasa menjadi seorang anggota pentadbiran, iaitu, menjawat jawatan Timbalan Perdana Menteri dan Menteri Kewangan telah melakukan perbuatan rasuah di mana kamu telah:

- mengarahkan Datuk Mohd Said Awang, Pengarah Cawangan Khas dan Amir bin Junus, Timbalan pengarah Cawangan Khas II, Polis Diraja Malaysia memperoleh pengakuan bertulis daripada Ummi Haflida bt Ali bagi menafikan salah laku seks dan liwat yang dilakukan oleh kamu dengan tujuan melindungi diri kamu daripada sebarang tindakan atau prosiding bersifat jenayah dan akibatnya Ummi Hafilda bt Ali telah memberi pengakuan bertulis bertarikh 18 Ogos 1997 kepada Perdana Menteri seperti mana yang diarahkan, dan oleh yang demikian kamu telah melakukan satu kesalahan yang boleh dihukum di bawah seksyen 2(1) Ordinan No. 22 (Kuasa-Kuasa Perlu) Darurat, 1970".
5. "Bahawa kamu pada 27 haribulan Ogos 1997, di kediaman rasmi Timbalan Perdana Menteri, No 47, Jalan Damansara, di dalam Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur, semasa menjadi seorang anggota pentadbiran, iaitu, menjawat jawatan Timbalan Perdana Menteri dan Menteri Kewangan telah melakukan perbuatan rasuah di mana kamu telah mengarahkan Datuk Mohd Said bin Awang, Pengarah Gawangan Khas dan Amir bin Junus, Timbalan Pengarah Cawangan Khas II, Polis Diraja Malaysia menggesa Ummi Hafilda bt Ali supaya memberi kenyataan umum bertulis bagi menafikan salah laku seks dan liwat yang dilakukan oleh kamu dengan tujuan melindungi diri kamu daripada sebarang tindakan atau prosiding bersifat jenayah dan akibatnya Ummi Hafilda Ali memberikan kenyataan umum bertulis bertarikh 29 haribulan Ogos 1997 seperti yang diarahkan, dan oleh yang demikian kamu telah melakukan satu kesalahan yang boleh dihukum di bawah seksyen 2(1) Ordinan No.22 (Kuasa-Kuasa Perlu) Darurat, 1970".
Banduan yang dimaksudkan adalah Dato Sri Anwar bin Ibrahim yang kini merupakan Ahli Parlimen Permatang Pauh dan juga Ketua Pakatan Pembangkang. Banduan yang bercita cita mahu menjadi Banduan Perdana Menteri Malaysia.
 
Link From: The Sense,Credibility and accountability.. -

MELAYU OH MELAYU APALAH NASIB MU...

KENAPA HANYA BANGSA MELAYU SAHAJA YANG PERLU MENGINGATI SEJARAH NEGARA?

Melayu dikhianati?

Hati Awang semakin hari semakin ditoreh-toreh oleh tuntutan pelbagai pihak bukan Melayu yang bersikap terlalu rasis selepas Pilihan Raya Umum ke-12. Kita boleh tafsir apa sebabnya. Awang tidak mahu mengulas panjang kali ini, cukup sekadar disiarkan semula petikan kenyataan seorang pemimpin MCA, Tun Tan Siew Sin pada 30 April 1969 (dipetik daripada buku Khalid Awang Osman dan pernah diulas Ridhuan Tee Abdullah) untuk renungan kita semua.

''Orang Melayu menerusi UMNO bermurah hati melonggarkan syarat-syarat dalam undang-undang negara ini sehinggakan dalam masa 12 bulan selepas kemerdekaan, 90 peratus penduduk bukan Melayu menjadi warganegara. Ini berbeza dengan keadaan sebelum merdeka di mana 90 peratus daripada mereka masih tidak diiktiraf sebagai rakyat Tanah Melayu walaupun hampir 100 tahun hidup di bawah pemerintahan penjajah. Sebagai membalas kemurahan hati orang Melayu, MCA dan MIC bersetuju meneruskan dasar memelihara dan menghormati kedudukan istimewa orang Melayu dan dalam masa yang sama mempertahankan kepentingan-kepentingan sah kaum lain''.

Sebelum itu, seorang pemimpin MIC Tun V.T Sambanthan pada 1 Jun 1965 pernah berkata:

''Pada tahun 1955 kita telah memenangi pilihan raya dengan majoriti yang tinggi, selanjutnya mendapat kemerdekaan dalam masa dua tahun kemudian. Dalam jangka masa itu, kita terpaksa berbincang dan menangani pelbagai perkara termasuk soal kewarganegaraan. Persoalannya di sini, apakah yang dilakukan oleh orang Melayu memandangkan kita bercakap menyentuh perkauman?

Apakah yang dilakukan oleh pemimpin-pemimpin Melayu? Mereka mempunyai 88 peratus daripada pengundi menyokong mereka. Apakah yang mereka putuskan mengenai isu kewarganegaraan? ''Jika kita lihat di serata negara Asia dan Asia Timur, kita akan mendapati kaum India tidak akan diterima di Ceylon dan juga tidak diterima di Burma. Sama halnya dengan kaum Cina, mereka tidak diterima di Thailand, Vietnam, Kemboja dan di negara-negara lain. Apakah bantuan berhubung kewarganegaraan yang mereka peroleh di semua wilayah tersebut? "Di Burma, seperti yang kita semua sedia maklum, kaum India telah diusir keluar, di Ceylon mereka tidak diberikan taraf warganegara seperti juga di Burma. Saya tahu dan anda juga tahu. Apa yang sedang berlaku di Malaya? Di sini kita mendapati pemimpin Melayu berkata, ''Kita akan menerima mereka sebagai saudara, kita akan berikan mereka sepenuh peluang untuk meneruskan kehidupan di negara ini, kita akan beri mereka peluang untuk menjadi warganegara''.
Seterusnya pada tahun 1957, dengan tidak mengambil kira kebolehan berbahasa (Melayu) ribuan orang India, Cina dan Ceylon menjadi warganegara. Seperti yang saya nyatakan, saya amat bernasib baik kerana dilahirkan di negara ini. Di manakah anda boleh berjumpa bangsa yang lebih prihatin, bersopan-santun dan tertib selain daripada bangsa Melayu. Di manakah anda boleh mendapat layanan politik yang baik untuk kaum pendatang? Di manakah dalam sejarah dunia? Saya bertanya kepada anda. Ini adalah fakta. Siapakah anda untuk menjaga keselamatan kami? Saya adalah kalangan 10 peratus kaum minoriti di sini. Tetapi saya amat gembira di sini.''
Persoalannya, kini apakah pengorbanan Melayu dikhianati oleh kaum lain?

-Awang Selamat-

Sunday, March 17, 2013

Azadi Asyraf..amalkan...
Papaya for Uric Acid Problem !!! 
Just try it if you've got uric acid after all no harm done.
This is a really effective, just mix green papaya cubes to the ordinary green tea, my cousin-brother tried and found it very effective. 
I have also shared with a friend with gout to try this (his "toe joints" started to deform), after a week of drinking this formula there is significant improvement, and after two weeks the toe joints heal and revert to normal state.
It is almost three years now, the joint pain is gone, but he maintains the intake between 1-3 times monthly to avoid relapse.
Other friends suffering from years of gout problem have also recovered. 
It is good for all, even those without gout.
Good formula! Do share with the people in need!
An improved sequence by Professor Lai from the China School of Pharmacy :
Cut green papaya into small cubes, place into the water, bring to boil, then add tea leaves, similar to the tea-making process. 
Clinical tests show that this brings better effects for treatment of gout, subject to frequent drinking of this formula.
Mr. Liu Qing, Chief of the Rende Town in Tainan, was suffering for years from severe stomach pain around the posterior wall of stomach. 
He used green papaya as a tea pot to prepare the family tea daily, after a month, his chronic disease condition was much improved. 
His family members with high uric acid were also healed by the same papaya tea. 
For this Mr. Liu planted a lot of papaya to share with relatives and friends with similar sickness.
According to Mr. Liu, in selecting the green papaya as tea pot, pick those the shape of which is fat and short, with larger capacity. 
Cut off the top part of the papaya, clear away the seeds, open a small hole at the upper side wall to facilitate pouring of tea. 
Create a small ventilation hole at top cover, put in the tea leaves, pour in boiling water, place the top cover back onto the papaya, you may also use the toothpicks to secure the top cover. 
Similar to normal process of preparing tea.
Liu like to use Oolong tea as the taste is good. 
He was pleasantly surprised that the stomach pains he suffered for many years was healed after a month of drinking tea from the green papaya pot, without taking any other medication. 
He passed some green papaya leaves to a friend who worked at a Medical Center to test and analyse the content. 
The tests confirmed that the healthy enzyme present in papaya is beneficial to human health. 
Now as papaya in Mr. Liu's orchard is yielding suitable size fruits, he would share the fruits with family and friends.
Xu Fuchang, an experienced papaya farmer, said green papaya means to unripe papaya, where the skin is still green in colour. 
Generally, the papaya takes about four months to fully mature and ripen, but the healing effect would be lost after it is fully ripe. 
Green papaya should be harvested when the papaya is approximately three months old, when the fruit is still firm, and the "papaya milk" contains high papaya enzyme and other healthy ingredients.
Not only the green papaya can be used in tea drinking, you may also cut them into cubes, and boil with the ribs, or even slicing the green papaya into fine long pieces and fried with garlic, very tasty, and no adverse effects on the human body.
Papaya for Uric Acid Problem !!!
Just try it if you've got uric acid after all no harm done.
This is a really effective, just mix green papaya cubes to the ordinary green tea, my cousin-brother tried and found it very effective.
I have also shared with a friend with gout to try this (his "toe joints" started to deform), after a week of drinking this formula there is significant improvement, and after two weeks the toe joints heal and revert to normal state.
It is almost three years now, the joint pain is gone, but he maintains the intake between 1-3 times monthly to avoid relapse.
Other friends suffering from years of gout problem have also recovered.
It is good for all, even those without gout.
Good formula! Do share with the people in need!
An improved sequence by Professor Lai from the China School of Pharmacy :
Cut green papaya into small cubes, place into the water, bring to boil, then add tea leaves, similar to the tea-making process.
Clinical tests show that this brings better effects for treatment of gout, subject to frequent drinking of this formula.
Mr. Liu Qing, Chief of the Rende Town in Tainan, was suffering for years from severe stomach pain around the posterior wall of stomach.
He used green papaya as a tea pot to prepare the family tea daily, after a month, his chronic disease condition was much improved.
His family members with high uric acid were also healed by the same papaya tea.
For this Mr. Liu planted a lot of papaya to share with relatives and friends with similar sickness.
According to Mr. Liu, in selecting the green papaya as tea pot, pick those the shape of which is fat and short, with larger capacity.
Cut off the top part of the papaya, clear away the seeds, open a small hole at the upper side wall to facilitate pouring of tea.
Create a small ventilation hole at top cover, put in the tea leaves, pour in boiling water, place the top cover back onto the papaya, you may also use the toothpicks to secure the top cover.
Similar to normal process of preparing tea.
Liu like to use Oolong tea as the taste is good.
He was pleasantly surprised that the stomach pains he suffered for many years was healed after a month of drinking tea from the green papaya pot, without taking any other medication.
He passed some green papaya leaves to a friend who worked at a Medical Center to test and analyse the content.
The tests confirmed that the healthy enzyme present in papaya is beneficial to human health.
Now as papaya in Mr. Liu's orchard is yielding suitable size fruits, he would share the fruits with family and friends.
Xu Fuchang, an experienced papaya farmer, said green papaya means to unripe papaya, where the skin is still green in colour.
Generally, the papaya takes about four months to fully mature and ripen, but the healing effect would be lost after it is fully ripe.
Green papaya should be harvested when the papaya is approximately three months old, when the fruit is still firm, and the "papaya milk" contains high papaya enzyme and other healthy ingredients.
Not only the green papaya can be used in tea drinking, you may also cut them into cubes, and boil with the ribs, or even slicing the green papaya into fine long pieces and fried with garlic, very tasty, and no adverse effects on the human body.
Like · · · 25 minutes ago ·

Friday, March 15, 2013

Filipino Version of SABAH...

Thousands of years ago, what is now known as the Philippines and what is known today as Borneo used to constitute a single historical, cultural, economic unit. Authoritative Western scientists have traced the land bridges that connected these two places. The inhabitants of the Philippines and Borneo come from the same racial stock, they have the same color, they have or used to have similar customs and traditions. Borneo is only 18 miles away from us today.
North Borneo, formerly known as Sabah, was originally ruled by the sultan of Brunei. In 1704, in gratitude for help extended to him by the sultan of Sulu in suppressing a revolt, the sultan of Brunei ceded North Borneo to the Sulu sultan.
Here, our claim really begins. Over the years, the various European countries, including Britain, Spain and the Netherlands, acknowledged the sultan of Sulu as the sovereign ruler of North Borneo. They entered into various treaty arrangements with him.
In 1878, a keen Austrian adventurer, by the name of Baron de Overbeck, having known that the sultan of Sulu was facing a life-and-death struggle with the Spanish forces in the Sulu Archipelago, went to Sulu, took advantage of the situation and persuaded the sultan of Sulu to lease to him, in consideration of a yearly rental of Malayan $5,000 (roughly equivalent to a meager US$1,600), the territory now in question. The contract of lease—and I call it so on the basis of British documents and records that cannot be disputed here or abroad—contains a technical description of the territory in terms of natural boundaries, thus:
“… all the territories and lands being tributary to us on the mainland of the island of Borneo commencing from the Pandassan River on the NW coast and extending along the whole east coast as far as the Sibuco River in the south and comprising, among others, the states of Peitan, Sugut, Bangaya, Labuk, Sandakan, Kinabatangan, Muniang and all the other territories and states to the southward thereof bordering on Darvel Bay and as far as the Sibuco River with all the islands within three marine leagues of the coast.”
Contract to Dent
Overbeck later sold out all his rights under the contract to Alfred Dent, an English merchant, who established a provisional association and later a company, known as the British North Borneo Company, which assumed all the rights and obligations under the 1878 contract. This company was awarded a Royal Charter in 1881. A protest against the grant of the charter was lodged by the Spanish and the Dutch governments and in reply, the British government clarified its position and stated in unmistakable language that “sovereignty remains with the sultan of Sulu” and that the company was merely an administering authority.
In 1946, the British North Borneo Company transferred all its rights and obligations to the British Crown. The Crown, on July 10, 1946—just six days after Philippine independence—asserted full sovereign rights over North Borneo, as of that date. Shortly thereafter former American Governor General Francis Burton Harrison, then special adviser to the Philippine government on foreign affairs, denounced the cession order as a unilateral act in violation of legal rights. In 1950, Congressman Macapagal—along with Congressmen Arsenio Lacson and Arturo Tolentino—sponsored a resolution urging the formal institution of the claim to North Borneo. Prolonged studies were in the meanwhile undertaken and in 1962 the House of Representatives, in rare unanimity, passed a resolution urging the President of the Philippines to recover North Borneo consistent with international law and procedure. Acting on this unanimous resolution and having acquired all the rights and interests of the sultanate of Sulu, the Republic of the Philippines, through the President, filed the claim to North Borneo.
Basis of PH claim
Our claim is mainly based on the following propositions: that Overbeck and Dent, not being sovereign entities nor representing sovereign entities, could not and did not acquire dominion and sovereignty over North Borneo; that on the basis of authoritative British and Spanish documents, the British North Borneo Company, a private trading concern to whom Dent transferred his rights, did not and could not acquire dominion and sovereignty over North Borneo; that their rights were as those indicated in the basic contract, namely, that of a lessee and a mere delegate; that in accordance with established precedents in international law, the assertion of sovereign rights by the British Crown in 1946, in complete disregard of the contract of 1878 and their solemn commitments, did not and cannot produce legal results in the form of a new tide. (Full text of Salonga’s and Sumulong’s speeches are available at Inquirer.net.)